Tux3 Report: Faster than tmpfs, what?

[james northrup]

also interesting information... Study of 2,047 papers on PubMed finds
that two-thirds of retracted papers were down to scientific
misconduct, not error

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Daniel Phillips
<daniel.raymond.phillips at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for the catch - I should indeed have noted that "modified
> dbench" was used for this benchmark, thus amplifying Tux3's advantage
> in delete performance. This literary oversight does not make the
> results any less interesting: we beat Tmpfs on that particular load.
> Beating tmpfs at anything is worthy of note. Obviously, all three