[Tux3] Tux3 report: Tux3 Git tree available

Nick Piggin nickpiggin at yahoo.com.au
Sat Mar 14 21:14:27 PDT 2009


On Sunday 15 March 2009 15:08:52 Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Saturday 14 March 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 March 2009 14:24:29 Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > I expect implementing VM extents to be a brutally complex project, as
> > > filesystem extents always turn out to be, even though one tends to
> > > enter such projects thinking, how hard could this be?  Answer: harder
> > > than you think.  But VM extents would be good for a modest speedup, so
> > > somebody is sure to get brave enough to try it sometime.
> >
> > I don't think there is enough evidence to be able to make such an
> > assertion.
> >
> > When you actually implement extent splitting and merging in a deadlock
> > free manner and synchronize everything properly I wouldn't be surprised
> > if it is slower most of the time. If it was significantly faster, then
> > memory fragmentation means that it is going to get significantly slower
> > over the uptime of the kernel, so you would have to virtually map the
> > kernel and implement memory defragmentation, at which point you get even
> > slower and more complex.
>
> You can make exactly the same argument about filesystem extents, and
> we know that extents are faster there.  So what is the fundamental
> difference?

Uh, aside from all the obvious fundamental differences there are, you
can only make such an assertion if performance characteristics and
usage patterns are very similar, nevermind fundamentally different...



_______________________________________________
Tux3 mailing list
Tux3 at tux3.org
http://mailman.tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3



More information about the Tux3 mailing list