[Tux3] Tux3 report: Tux3 Git tree available
Daniel Phillips
phillips at phunq.net
Sat Mar 14 21:08:52 PDT 2009
On Saturday 14 March 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Sunday 15 March 2009 14:24:29 Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > I expect implementing VM extents to be a brutally complex project, as
> > filesystem extents always turn out to be, even though one tends to
> > enter such projects thinking, how hard could this be? Answer: harder
> > than you think. But VM extents would be good for a modest speedup, so
> > somebody is sure to get brave enough to try it sometime.
>
> I don't think there is enough evidence to be able to make such an
> assertion.
>
> When you actually implement extent splitting and merging in a deadlock
> free manner and synchronize everything properly I wouldn't be surprised
> if it is slower most of the time. If it was significantly faster, then
> memory fragmentation means that it is going to get significantly slower
> over the uptime of the kernel, so you would have to virtually map the
> kernel and implement memory defragmentation, at which point you get even
> slower and more complex.
You can make exactly the same argument about filesystem extents, and
we know that extents are faster there. So what is the fundamental
difference?
Regards,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Tux3 mailing list
Tux3 at tux3.org
http://mailman.tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3
More information about the Tux3
mailing list