[Tux3] Further sync for inode.c

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

Daniel Phillips <phillips at phunq.net> writes:

> On Thursday 20 November 2008 16:24, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> > Is there are reason to change tux_path[] to *tux_path?
>> 
>> We are allocate it by alloc_path(), so it's not array actually now.
>
> You can still declare it as an array function parameter, which is
> good documentation.  But it's not very important important.  Should
> I pull now?

Yes, it is same on parameter completely. Maybe it's just my habit, if
it's actual array - foo[], and it pointer to array - *foo.

Well, it's not very important. However, I'd like to use one of those,
because current code has both of those. I care about it.

If you like foo[], I'll change all of those.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi at mail.parknet.co.jp>

_______________________________________________
Tux3 mailing list
Tux3 at tux3.org
http://tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3