[Tux3] Further sync for inode.c
hirofumi at mail.parknet.co.jp
Fri Nov 21 01:17:32 PST 2008
Daniel Phillips <phillips at phunq.net> writes:
> On Thursday 20 November 2008 16:24, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> > Is there are reason to change tux_path to *tux_path?
>> We are allocate it by alloc_path(), so it's not array actually now.
> You can still declare it as an array function parameter, which is
> good documentation. But it's not very important important. Should
> I pull now?
Yes, it is same on parameter completely. Maybe it's just my habit, if
it's actual array - foo, and it pointer to array - *foo.
Well, it's not very important. However, I'd like to use one of those,
because current code has both of those. I care about it.
If you like foo, I'll change all of those.
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi at mail.parknet.co.jp>
Tux3 mailing list
Tux3 at tux3.org
More information about the Tux3