[Tux3] Further sync for inode.c

[Daniel Phillips]

On Thursday 20 November 2008 16:24, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > Is there are reason to change tux_path[] to *tux_path?
> 
> We are allocate it by alloc_path(), so it's not array actually now.

You can still declare it as an array function parameter, which is
good documentation.  But it's not very important important.  Should
I pull now?

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Tux3 mailing list
Tux3 at tux3.org
http://tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3