[Tux3] Further sync for inode.c

Daniel Phillips phillips at phunq.net
Thu Nov 20 21:45:24 PST 2008

On Thursday 20 November 2008 16:24, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > Is there are reason to change tux_path[] to *tux_path?
> We are allocate it by alloc_path(), so it's not array actually now.

You can still declare it as an array function parameter, which is
good documentation.  But it's not very important important.  Should
I pull now?


Tux3 mailing list
Tux3 at tux3.org

More information about the Tux3 mailing list