[Tux3] Further sync for inode.c
phillips at phunq.net
Thu Nov 20 21:45:24 PST 2008
On Thursday 20 November 2008 16:24, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > Is there are reason to change tux_path to *tux_path?
> We are allocate it by alloc_path(), so it's not array actually now.
You can still declare it as an array function parameter, which is
good documentation. But it's not very important important. Should
I pull now?
Tux3 mailing list
Tux3 at tux3.org
More information about the Tux3