[Tux3] forward logging and NVRAM
Daniel Phillips
phillips at phunq.net
Sun Jul 27 14:29:06 PDT 2008
Hi Timothy,
On Sunday 27 July 2008 14:10, timothy norman huber wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Several weeks ago, during a discussion over coffee, you mentioned a
> rather intriguing optimization- by writing the start of the forward
> log chain to NVRAM rather than disk, you avoid a disk seek and write
> transfer for each forward log chain. i believe there was another
> motivation that had to do with avoiding traversing the entire volume
> in case of a crash. Was this design feature to overcome lame fsck
> performance?
The same motivation, actually. Writing the start of a forward log
chain to nvram instead of to some known location on disk means that I
do not have to worry about doing unnatural things to optimize such
loads as O_SYNC writing, where each transaction has to complete
before the next one can begin, which means that the forward log chain
never gets more than one element log, requiring a seek to the known
location for every transaction. Not worse than journalling to be
sure, and usually better, but not as fast as avoiding a seek and disk
write per transaction entirely.
So if somebody could give me 16 bytes of NVRAM or so per volume I
would be most pleased and could use that to generate some nice O_SYNC
benchmarks :-)
By the way, I wonder why your posts do not show up in the Mailman
(Pipermail) archive, while mine and Matt's do?
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Tux3 mailing list
Tux3 at tux3.org
http://tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3
More information about the Tux3
mailing list