Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?
Daniel Phillips
daniel at phunq.net
Thu Apr 30 03:59:08 PDT 2015
On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 8:50:57 PM PDT, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 13:40 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>>
>> That order of magnitude latency difference is striking. It sounds
>> good, but what does it mean? I see a smaller difference here, maybe
>> because of running under KVM.
>
> That max_latency thing is flush.
Right, it is just the max run time of all operations, including flush
(dbench's name for fsync I think) which would most probably be the longest
running one. I would like to know how we manage to pull that off. Now
that you mention it, I see a factor of two or so latency win here, not
the order of magnitude that you saw. Maybe KVM introduces some fuzz
for me.
I checked whether fsync = sync is the reason, and no. Well, that goes
on the back burner, we will no doubt figure it out in due course.
Regards,
Daniel
More information about the Tux3
mailing list