Fsck Revisited

Daniel Phillips daniel.raymond.phillips at gmail.com
Sun Jan 27 16:12:03 PST 2013


On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:03 PM, OGAWA Hirofumi
<hirofumi at mail.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
> Daniel Phillips <daniel.raymond.phillips at gmail.com> writes:
>> ..Your suggestion is the best
>> to implement at first, and at worst, it might create an unusually large
>> number of log blocks, which is worth testing in itself. Note: it is possible
>> to construct a case where the volume hits ENOSPC during fsck repair,
>> which would be bad. So both approaches may need to be available in a
>> production ready fsck.
>
> I guess, then, you can run force_rollup(), instead of force_delta(). So,
> logblocks are obsoleted, and bitmap will be flushed instead.

Yes, nice. Some heuristic would be needed based on could of differences.

Regards,

Daniel



More information about the Tux3 mailing list