[Tux3] Further sync for inode.c

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

Daniel Phillips <phillips at phunq.net> writes:

>> Well, it's not very important. However, I'd like to use one of those,
>> because current code has both of those. I care about it.
>> 
>> If you like foo[], I'll change all of those.
>
> I think foo[] is (a little) better because this structure really is
> an array.

I've changed all *foo to foo[]. Please review and pull it.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi at mail.parknet.co.jp>

_______________________________________________
Tux3 mailing list
Tux3 at tux3.org
http://tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3